<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metallurgical grade silicon an alternative to Polysilicon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/</link>
	<description>research . analysis . forecasting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:50:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DT Barki</title>
		<link>http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/comment-page-1/#comment-10245</link>
		<dc:creator>DT Barki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/#comment-10245</guid>
		<description>Dear David,

I had made a presentatation during 22nd EU PV conf in Milan, sep 2007 to convey that there must be a path-nreaking approach to produce &quot;crude silico&quot; at one-fourth the prestent cost to make solar pv truly commercial. In this connection, I find your arguement of alternate to &#039;polysilicon&#039; - MG silicon. We are already working on such a path and seem your further information. 

Once I recieve your response, I shall continue the communication with you. Pl visit our website www.solarnest.net.

DT Barki</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear David,</p>
<p>I had made a presentatation during 22nd EU PV conf in Milan, sep 2007 to convey that there must be a path-nreaking approach to produce &#8220;crude silico&#8221; at one-fourth the prestent cost to make solar pv truly commercial. In this connection, I find your arguement of alternate to &#8216;polysilicon&#8217; &#8211; MG silicon. We are already working on such a path and seem your further information. </p>
<p>Once I recieve your response, I shall continue the communication with you. Pl visit our website <a href="http://www.solarnest.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.solarnest.net</a>.</p>
<p>DT Barki</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Stewart</title>
		<link>http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/comment-page-1/#comment-8889</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/#comment-8889</guid>
		<description>I am trying to figure out what the distinction is with Timminco.  The article that I read at EcoLog.com suggests that Timminco is producing an industrial / chemical grade silicon that is currently 5/9th the purity of the polysilicon required for the semi-conductor industry.  Is Timminco&#039;s industrial grade silicon used as is in the production of solar panels or is it upgraded from there to the higher purity 99.999.... silicon? Timminco&#039;s factory is to cost $24 million to produce 3600 metric tonnes of industrial grade silicon rather than the $500 million for high purity 99.999...% factory that produces 5000 metric tonnes per year.

Apparently, the 99.999..% pure silicon is required for semiconductors with very little silicon used in each.  However, it seems that there is a considerable amount of silicon used in the production of each solar panel.

Timminco appears to have an edge but what is it?

Two analysts from Sprott have been on BNN. Their talk is all about achieving 99.999...% purity polysilicon.  That would appear to be entirely misleading.  The edge seems to be producing lower grade silicon at considerably less expense sufficient for solar panels.

I know, and I emphasize know, that there are a lot of smart people in that room at Sprott.  They know the edge that Timminco has.  They have invested serious money.  What is Timminco&#039;s edge?

Any clarification would be most appreciated.

Regards,

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to figure out what the distinction is with Timminco.  The article that I read at EcoLog.com suggests that Timminco is producing an industrial / chemical grade silicon that is currently 5/9th the purity of the polysilicon required for the semi-conductor industry.  Is Timminco&#8217;s industrial grade silicon used as is in the production of solar panels or is it upgraded from there to the higher purity 99.999&#8230;. silicon? Timminco&#8217;s factory is to cost $24 million to produce 3600 metric tonnes of industrial grade silicon rather than the $500 million for high purity 99.999&#8230;% factory that produces 5000 metric tonnes per year.</p>
<p>Apparently, the 99.999..% pure silicon is required for semiconductors with very little silicon used in each.  However, it seems that there is a considerable amount of silicon used in the production of each solar panel.</p>
<p>Timminco appears to have an edge but what is it?</p>
<p>Two analysts from Sprott have been on BNN. Their talk is all about achieving 99.999&#8230;% purity polysilicon.  That would appear to be entirely misleading.  The edge seems to be producing lower grade silicon at considerably less expense sufficient for solar panels.</p>
<p>I know, and I emphasize know, that there are a lot of smart people in that room at Sprott.  They know the edge that Timminco has.  They have invested serious money.  What is Timminco&#8217;s edge?</p>
<p>Any clarification would be most appreciated.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/comment-page-1/#comment-8096</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/#comment-8096</guid>
		<description>Cyriak.

You can e-mail me at dtomljenovic@sprott.com and I would be glad to forward you some information on Timminco&#039;s metallurgical PV silicon process.

All the best,


David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyriak.</p>
<p>You can e-mail me at <a href="mailto:dtomljenovic@sprott.com">dtomljenovic@sprott.com</a> and I would be glad to forward you some information on Timminco&#8217;s metallurgical PV silicon process.</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyriak  Papasissis</title>
		<link>http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/comment-page-1/#comment-8050</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyriak  Papasissis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/#comment-8050</guid>
		<description>Hallo  David
 I  would  be  very  interested  indeed  to  learn  more  details  about  the  processes  TIMMINCO  employs.
                        thanks in advance
                             Cyriak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallo  David<br />
 I  would  be  very  interested  indeed  to  learn  more  details  about  the  processes  TIMMINCO  employs.<br />
                        thanks in advance<br />
                             Cyriak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/comment-page-1/#comment-6974</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energy.financialnirvana.com/2007/03/11/metallurgical-grade-silicon-an-alternative-to-polysilicon/#comment-6974</guid>
		<description>You may want to look at a Toronto based company called Timminco.  It is publicly listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol TIM.  

They have a very high quality 99.999% purity metallurgical silicon manufacturing process that has a very low impurity level especially of boron which is a problematic impurity.  

It appears as though their VERY low CAPEX intensity and previous +10 years of experience as a chemical grade silicon maker could allow them to become a major force in the metallurgical solar silicon industry.

I would be glad to provide more details to those who may be interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to look at a Toronto based company called Timminco.  It is publicly listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol TIM.  </p>
<p>They have a very high quality 99.999% purity metallurgical silicon manufacturing process that has a very low impurity level especially of boron which is a problematic impurity.  </p>
<p>It appears as though their VERY low CAPEX intensity and previous +10 years of experience as a chemical grade silicon maker could allow them to become a major force in the metallurgical solar silicon industry.</p>
<p>I would be glad to provide more details to those who may be interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

